View Full Version: Season 5 General Discussion

houseofwhining >>Season Five >>Season 5 General Discussion


<< Prev | Next >>

Poeia- 11-09-2008

I certainly don't see Season 5 as a farce. Overall, it's working for me better than Season 4 did even if I don't like it as much as I did the first 3. I miss the clinic patients terribly. In most of my favorite episodes, the patient of the week's situation/ailment paralleled House's situation. This year that was true of Not Cancer, Adverse Effects and Joy -- seeing only what's wrong with the world, a warped perspective and not being able to feel joy. Birthmarks had the biological parents vs. the people who raised you -- which ones are truly your parents and who made you the way you are. But, as far as I can tell, Dying Changes Everything and Lucky Thirteen were about parallels with Thirteen's situation. If someone sees the House parallels in these, I'd love to be enlightened. (And, yes, fellows should get the occasional very special episode but even then there should be some tie-in to House other than his lesbian fantasies.) Although, as I typed the above, I finally saw a theme for this season. It's "you're miserable, House" without (thank goodness) everyone repeating those three words every episode.

Namaste- 11-09-2008

I certainly don't see Season 5 as a farce. Overall, it's working for me better than Season 4 did even if I don't like it as much as I did the first 3. ------ But, as far as I can tell, Dying Changes Everything and Lucky Thirteen were about parallels with Thirteen's situation. If someone sees the House parallels in these, I'd love to be enlightened. (And, yes, fellows should get the occasional very special episode but even then there should be some tie-in to House other than his lesbian fantasies.) I don't see Season Five as literally a farce either, but rather in taking elements of the classic farce -- a stylized universe, wordplay, a world in which there is no poetic justice -- and using that as a lens through which to view House's world. In terms of "Lucky thirteen" and how it parallels House's world ... Thirteen seeks to hide her emotional issues in anonymous sex, but yet is confronted with reality again and again and finds there is no escape. House thinks he's got his life back on even keel and uses practical jokes to mask his emotional relief that Wilson is back, only to be confronted with the fact that he has no more control his world -- in this case, Cuddy's desire for a child -- than Thirteen does in thinking she can control the development of Huntington's.

peggy06- 11-09-2008

the Taub storyline was OK but House's interference bothered me much more. One, he doesn't even have the justification that the records belong to an employee, for whatever that's worth. Two, the "case" against Mrs. Taub was sketchy and there were equally likely innocent explanations, so it fails on the level of storytelling. But most importantly, it is utterly beyond the pale and beneath contempt to break into someone's house and go through their private papers out of idle curiosity. Given that House has, since the pilot, been willing to dig into sealed records to satisfy his curiosity, I don't see how anything he did to the new team was beneath contempt, but what he did with his old team was admirable somehow. Who said it was admirable? I said he at least had a reason. For the PI, there was no reason. The only reason was to give him a reason to hire a PI, and we know the reason for that. He didn't have any motive in digging up things on Foreman than wondering what he'd bring up. He was intrigued on what he dug up, so he hired him. There was nothing specific there other than the same motivation he had on digging up things on his new team. I disagree. He was looking at a new hire. Again, there was a reason for checking into his background beyond just nosiness. I'm also not sure why House digging into Cameron's medical files because he wants to know more about her past is admirable, but House digging into Taub's present because he wants to know more about him is jumping the shark. Putting words in my mouth. I never said or even hinted that looking at Cameron's files was admirable, but it was at least motivated by an issue with her on-the-job behavior, which makes it a step above wanting to get info to hold over people. I never said House was jumping the shark. I started this with a complaint about David Shore using this show in a way that IMO demeaned the title character, making him do something on a level he hadn't done before - invading others' privacy just for the heck of it. The one resulted in Cameron confiding some personal details to House that fit into her overall arc; the other resulted in Taub taking House on in a way that fits into his developing arc. I wasn't thrilled with the storytelling involving Cam's crush, and I'm willing to see how the storytelling surrounding Taub's commitment issues goes. I have no problem with them exploring Taub's commitment issues, just with the device that started this instance of the exploration. I haven't seen a House who respects boundaries about people's privacy since season one. I know it's a mileage varying issue, so we've probably covered the topic now, so I'll just say that the moment for me that made me stop and take stock of what I thought I knew about this character was when he broke into Stacy's private therapy file for manipulative purposes and shared what he found with Wilson, with not a blink of remorse at any point. Even when he talked to Stacy, he was very clear that the only thing he was sorry for was that the timing of being found out coincided with the timing of Stacy realising she liked spending time with him. That was all. I was able to accept that aspect of House in season two, and to me, the PI stuff doesn't even come close to that level of guiltless intrusion. That moment dismayed me, too, and it was filmed in such a way that we were intended to be shocked and dismayed. I contend that the PI investigations were filmed in a way that we were intended to chuckle ruefully and go, "Oh, that House!" The entire thing was played for laughs, and yet it presents a man who will break the law and his employees' trust for absolutely no reason. Yes, I know, he's broken those things before, but again, he had at least a point in the previous instances. In the case of Stacy, it was part of his emotional turmoil and desperation to rekindle what they once had. It was still horrible, but there was that mitigating factor. The absence of any mitigating factor for the S5 antics, and the light in which it places House, is my complaint. I cannot possibly put it any clearer than that. If you don't see a difference in degree between the S5 behavior and previous seasons, that's all there is to it and we will have to agree to disagree. Please do allow my right to a viewpoint, that's all I ask.

DOB1234- 11-09-2008

He didn't have any motive in digging up things on Foreman than wondering what he'd bring up. He was intrigued on what he dug up, so he hired him. There was nothing specific there other than the same motivation he had on digging up things on his new team. But didn’t House say in the pilot that he was looking for someone with ‘street smarts’ to add to his team? I think he didn’t want to add another ‘circle queen’ or doctor’s son to the ducklings. (He probably didn’t know at the time of hiring him that Chase’s history was more interesting than ‘wealthy doctor’s son who also goes into medicine’.) He was probably intrigued by Foreman’s background when he first applied, the whole working his way up thing, and the discovery of the juvenile record was the fillip that convinced House that Foreman would add something good to his team. I don’t think for one minute that he was just rummaging around in Foreman’s past without a motive. I think House always has a motive. How ironic is it that Foreman has always been the most conventional duckling, unwilling to step outside the box, and it was the doctor’s son who became the best lateral thinker. I haven't seen a House who respects boundaries about people's privacy since season one. I know it's a mileage varying issue, so we've probably covered the topic now, so I'll just say that the moment for me that made me stop and take stock of what I thought I knew about this character was when he broke into Stacy's private therapy file for manipulative purposes and shared what he found with Wilson, with not a blink of remorse at any point. That was a very critical point for me in deciding whether or not I wanted to continue to watch this show. To my regret, I wasn’t watching House from the very beginning. I got into the show from watching the USA Friday night repeats after Monk. I left the TV on for this medical show (and I don't watch medical shows) and barely paid attention at first, but I was soon hooked. I didn’t know House very well when the breaking into Stacy’s file took place, and I remember being shocked that he did that and almost, almost, deciding that I didn’t like this character at all and it was time to find something else to watch. I am so glad I didn’t. Every TV show is unrealistic. Every show operates under its own particular rules. Getting DNA results within hours? Try weeks or months in the real world. A lab of one goth girl who can do everything? Laughable. Crime scene techs who run interviews with suspects? Please. Denny Crane? Wouldn't be allowed near a courtroom. So accepting a House view of the universe in which doctors run lab -*test*-('")s, surgeons perform every type of operation, the timeline is hard to pin down (though from the first season we were informed that time isn't a constant, so that shouldn't be any surprise) and illnesses follow atypical paths is not a problem for me. It's consistent within the universe that fits House's world. Very nicely and very convincingly put. I think I will now back off some from my worries that House, the character, is getting too far 'out there’ and just continue to enjoy the journey.

Boffle- 11-09-2008

Lots of good reading here, really good posts all, but I'm not in the frame of mind this morning to add much to the debates... Just wanted to say peggy06 that I felt like you did about them adding the PI just to -*test*-('") him out for a possible series...before I saw the episodes. I liked the character, but thought he was too much of a "nicer House" kind of character, which wouldn't work on its own. Maybe a show more like Psych, I dunno. But that said, it worked to give House someone to talk to when Wilson was gone, someone who, unlike Wilson, is not there because he chooses to be, but because he is paid. But, like Wilson, he is someone whom House doesn't employ nor is he employed by him. He's close to an impartial voice and that's what House needed to think, to bounce his ideas off. Even more, he needs to do the outrageous, crazy thing of hiring the PI to balance what he feels about Amber's death and Wilson's leaving. Both are huge, huge events and business as usual doesn't cut it for House. Like in Distractions, he went to great lengths from stalking an old grudge to taking LSD to hiring an escort just to be distracted from Stacy leaving. House doesn't do well with loss, so this was another of his big stunts to distract himself, gather data (which he just loves to do, as I just posted about a bit). Anyway, I thought they pulled it off within the show pretty well despite what might be described as a venal motive for putting him there. I enjoyed his visit, his flirting with Cuddy, which may have pushed House a little bit toward her. Plus, the brief blues thing they played was just lovely and I'll forgive anyone who puts Hugh Laurie on my TV playing music.

jair- 11-09-2008

If you don't see a difference in degree between the S5 behavior and previous seasons, that's all there is to it and we will have to agree to disagree. Please do allow my right to a viewpoint, that's all I ask. Of course! And vice versa--you brought up very discussable points.

peggy06- 11-09-2008

Lots of good reading here, really good posts all, but I'm not in the frame of mind this morning to add much to the debates... Just wanted to say peggy06 that I felt like you did about them adding the PI just to -*test*-('") him out for a possible series...before I saw the episodes. I liked the character, but thought he was too much of a "nicer House" kind of character, which wouldn't work on its own. Maybe a show more like Psych, I dunno. But that said, it worked to give House someone to talk to when Wilson was gone, someone who, unlike Wilson, is not there because he chooses to be, but because he is paid. But, like Wilson, he is someone whom House doesn't employ nor is he employed by him. He's close to an impartial voice and that's what House needed to think, to bounce his ideas off. Even more, he needs to do the outrageous, crazy thing of hiring the PI to balance what he feels about Amber's death and Wilson's leaving. Both are huge, huge events and business as usual doesn't cut it for House. Like in Distractions, he went to great lengths from stalking an old grudge to taking LSD to hiring an escort just to be distracted from Stacy leaving. House doesn't do well with loss, so this was another of his big stunts to distract himself, gather data (which he just loves to do, as I just posted about a bit). Anyway, I thought they pulled it off within the show pretty well despite what might be described as a venal motive for putting him there. I enjoyed his visit, his flirting with Cuddy, which may have pushed House a little bit toward her. Plus, the brief blues thing they played was just lovely and I'll forgive anyone who puts Hugh Laurie on my TV playing music. Thanks for your comments, Boffle. I'm glad it worked for you. For me, there were a couple of fun moments with the PI, but not enough to justify the steps it took to get him there. I just wonder how the first few episodes of the season might have been played if this device had not been used. The cast is overcrowded - not just my opinion but one that's been voiced by many fans and critics alike - and taking up time for a transient character was, IMO, a poor decision. The motivation behind it is evident in the mixed results. We can fanwank reasons for House to do this, but that is, for me, unsatisfying. There are many Houseian ways he could have reacted to his feelings over Amber's death and his role in it, but this one just seems odd - because I'll bet you anything they didn't come up with the idea first, they jerryrigged his reaction so they could introduce this character. I would have found it more interesting by far for House to have had to struggle without Wilson's companionship than to give him this instant crutch. Maybe he would have had to bounce his ideas off, oh, I dunno, his team? I'm just saying. They devoted an entire episode last season to why and how much he needed one, with Wilson himself leading the charge, and then a lengthy arc to choosing the new members. Since a considerable number of fans are still not on board with the new team, it would seem better to concentrate on House and all of the existing cast rather than bring in someone new. I also feel this was an unwontedly lighthearted device coming after the hugely emotional end to S4. For my money, so far they've squandered most of the potential from HH and WH. I really expected more from the beginning of this season and feel I might have had it if not for this PI thing. It was a stunt, it's over, and I didn't like most of it because it wasted time and I found it demeaning. But what's especially annoying is that this came courtesy of David "I-know-best" Shore, whose right to keep to his artistic vision I defended last year.

Chipmunk_love- 11-09-2008

But what's especially annoying is that this came courtesy of David "I-know-best" Shore, whose right to keep to his artistic vision I defended last year. Well, the condition of defending an artistic vision is that, yeah, sometimes showrunners are going to make decisions with which you don't necessarily agree. However, it's their show and their decision and nobody else's. The last thing House is, is a democracy. The only say you and any other fans have in the matter is whether or not you're still going to support the show afterwards with your viewership. And since you're still here, I'm going to assume that's the decision that you made.

peggy06- 11-09-2008

But what's especially annoying is that this came courtesy of David "I-know-best" Shore, whose right to keep to his artistic vision I defended last year. Well, the condition of defending an artistic vision is that, yeah, sometimes showrunners are going to make decisions with which you don't necessarily agree. However, it's their show and their decision and nobody else's. The last thing House is, is a democracy. The only say you and any other fans have in the matter is whether or not you're still going to support the show afterwards with your viewership. And since you're still here, I'm going to assume that's the decision that you made. You missed my point. The use of House to try out a character for a new show cannot seriously be considered as an expression of anyone's artistic vision. It's a commercial consideration. In the light of a remark that many found high-handed but I defended at the time, well, it's ironic to say the least.

NightOwl- 11-09-2008

I remember hearing David Shore say that the P.I. idea came from the network but that he would not have gone along with it if the P.I. character had not worked with his story, with his artistic vision, etc. You may or may not believe David Shore, but I tend to take his words at face value. I have no reason to think he's lying to save face about the network forcing him to do something. And I do think DS takes a lot of pride in his work and is fairly stubborn, like the character he created. I think he stays true to himself and his vision, and I think the network trusts his vision. I can't imagine they'd force him to do something that he thinks would be detrimental to the show. (Yes, I know the Vogler idea came from Fox... that was in season 1, when the show was still young and unproven. Things are different now.)

jair- 11-09-2008

The use of House to try out a character for a new show cannot seriously be considered as an expression of anyone's artistic vision. It's a commercial consideration. In the light of a remark that many found high-handed but I defended at the time, well, it's ironic to say the least. There's lots of ways for stories to come about and all that matters in the final analysis is whether it worked. For some Lucas did, for others he didn't, which is the same for the Vogler arc, which came about from a note from the network, and the same with the Tritter arc, which came about because the network wanted the drug use dealt with responsibly. The writers took the ideas and turned them into story. I liked Lucas because he and House had a good rapport, he allowed us to see that House spreads more than just misery as we saw that these two men, within the constraints of their commercial transaction, liked each other, which set up the Birthmarks episode where Wilson remembered what he enjoyed about House, and I always knew Lucas was not joining the cast as a permanent character. I don't regret his time on the show any more than I regret Ridiculously Old Fraud's and I liked him more than Tritter or Vogler, both of whom struck me as completely unbelievable. Vogler directing medicine because he gave money to the hospital??? Tritter setting up shop in the hospital on his vacation and reading personnel files without a warrant??? Lucas seemed to me to fit into House's world where personal boundaries exist for other people.

peggy06- 11-09-2008

I remember hearing David Shore say that the P.I. idea came from the network but that he would not have gone along with it if the P.I. character had not worked with his story, with his artistic vision, etc. You may or may not believe David Shore, but I tend to take his words at face value. I have no reason to think he's lying to save face about the network forcing him to do something. And I do think DS takes a lot of pride in his work and is fairly stubborn, like the character he created. I think he stays true to himself and his vision, and I think the network trusts his vision. I can't imagine they'd force him to do something that he thinks would be detrimental to the show. (Yes, I know the Vogler idea came from Fox... that was in season 1, when the show was still young and unproven. Things are different now.) Thanks for this correction. I have to apologize to David Shore, then, for thinking the PI was his idea. I know he doesn't have complete autonomy over this show, but it's sad what Fox is doing to their flagship scripted series. There's lots of ways for stories to come about and all that matters in the final analysis is whether it worked. For some Lucas did, for others he didn't, which is the same for the Vogler arc, which came about from a note from the network, and the same with the Tritter arc, which came about because the network wanted the drug use dealt with responsibly. It's interesting that the arcs seem to generate a lot of criticism. This reinforces my feeling that the show is strongest when most episodes are strong standalones with consistency in the characterization to be the unifying factor from episode to episode.

jair- 11-09-2008

To me, the strongest eps this season have been Dying Changes Everything (which I admit could have used a little less Thirteen--but the storyline was strong and the House/Wilson stuff absolutely stellar), Birthmarks and Joy, all of which follow the throughline generated from House's Head and Wilson's Heart and House's scene on the bus. But you're right that it isn't quite an arc, just not standalone, either. The arcs have always been problematic in one way or another, with I think the Stacy arc being the strongest--she just went on a bit too long, the same as the hiring arc. The PI was such a mini-arc he doesn't quite rate the name--he was just there to bring out some things about House that helped set up Birthmarks, while giving House some fodder to interact with his team on a more personal basis. I know you don't like the digging into personal business, but if one can go with that, and I can, I thought his presence gave us a wonderful peek into Taub and set up that Thirteen has been quietly jumping the traces in her personal life, which set up her walking on the wild side episode.

Poeia- 11-09-2008

One of the aspects of House's personality that I do not like is the degree to which he pries into others' private lives, especially in light of how he guards his own privacy. Stealing Stacy's file was probably the worst example of that (although I never did understand why she was seeing the same therapist that Mark was.) But the thing that bothered me the most about the P.I. was how out of character it was. House, the man who wears wrinkled shirt because he would never send his shirts out to be laundered, who orders his employees to pay for his cable TV and who has anyone and everyone pay for his meals, would never spend tens of thousands of dollars for the P.I.'s services. That's what tipped it past the point where my disbelief stopped being suspended.

Namaste- 11-09-2008

But the thing that bothered me the most about the P.I. was how out of character it was. House, the man who wears wrinkled shirt because he would never send his shirts out to be laundered, who orders his employees to pay for his cable TV and who has anyone and everyone pay for his meals, would never spend tens of thousands of dollars for the P.I.'s services. That's what tipped it past the point where my disbelief stopped being suspended. But House pays hundreds of dollars for Monster Truck tickets that he wants, he has top of the line stereo equipment, spends thousands on guitars and and his piano isn't cheap either. He just picks and chooses whether it's worth spending money on something. If he spends his own money, then it's really, really important to him. So to me, the fact that he'd willingly pay money for a PI to look in on Wilson simply points to how important that information was. The info on his other fellows was just an excuse to get the information he really wanted -- about Wilson.

Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.